Ed Driscoll.com Ed Driscoll.com
Shoveling Sputum In Manhattan
By Ed Driscoll · July 8, 2007 04:22 PM · Oh, That Liberal Media!

While waiting for Matt Drudge's breathless Katie Couric story, I came across this op-ed by Jeff Simon of The Buffalo News titled, "Katie Couric Deserves To Be Watched". There's more than a twinge of desperation in that headline, and not surprisingly, the Freepers, where I found the piece originally, can smell it. Key quote by Simon:

What people continually refuse to see is that nightly anchor is not a journalistic job as much as it is a theatrical one. It’s a role. And what we want from whoever takes the role is simplicity and reassurance. The nightly news anchor is auditioning for that moment when the country truly needs them — election nights or, most importantly, moments of national trauma when it’s their job to impart bad news in ways that keep spirits on an even keel.
Let's unpack that a bit: not everyone refuses to believe the anchorperson role is a theatrical one. And as I've also written before, I'm all-too-happy to tune out television on election night these days. The only thing interesting on those nights is seeing what sort of slick piece of high tech set design the anchor's art department comes up with to frame him in to generate a semblance of gravitas. Otherwise, the Internet is a far better place to be when election returns come tumbling in.

Finally, the idea that "The nightly news anchor is auditioning for that moment when the country truly needs them" is what has led to so much filler in the news, as Drew Curtis of Fark puts it, since the big three networks feel that they must generate a half hour of television news every night even as its ratings shrink. And there's infinitely even more filler on the 24-hour cable news channels.

So what have the network nightly news broadcasts become? Like the newspaper, largely an exercise in nostalgia, as Andrew Breitbart mentioned to me when I interviewed him last week:

I think that to a major a degree, Katie Couric and her ilk are doomed. I think that from my vantage, and I can’t speak for everyone else, but the Internet was the first nail in the nightly news coffin. But I think the TiVo and YouTube and the second and third ones. There’s almost nothing important that happens out there, that a person can’t come home and find online. That need to be in front of the television at 5:30 or 6:30 in the evening is over. Only people in their nursing homes, who are watching their television sets because that’s a lifelong habit are getting their news that way.

There so many people having a laugh at Katie Couric or Brian Williams’ expense because of the dwindling numbers but it’s a less a function of them being pathetic, as many would like to think, than the dramatic shifts in which we digest our information. There’s just almost no need for them.

I recall, on the weekend, watching shows that Stone Phillips and John Siegenthaler would put together for Dateline, which would take advantage of NBC’s vast video vault.

I look at Nightly News as a short-term nostalgia through the day’s events. It feels like those weekend shows, where they’re just taking advantage of the fact that they half hour of advertisements to sell and so it feels like a video vault filler session of the news events. And I think that the average person is looking at that half hour news hour with that sort of kitschy sensibility. It’s sort like, ‘I remember that story happening half a day ago; I saw it on CNN, I saw it again on CNN.com. Then I saw it again on the Drudge Report, and then I saw it again on Breitbart.com, or Breitbart.tv and YouTube.

So the networks are no long providing that first responder value that they used to. And it’s mildly tragic to watch how slow they’ve been to come to the realization that they, like everyone else, have to adapt to the market, and they’ve been quite slow to it.

More from Breitbart here.

Just as I finished this post, Drudge's story on Couric went up: Couric sounds like she's discovered her inner Patton, as she's "being accused of slapping an editor" after he inserted the world "sputum" into a script.

Thirty years from now, when you're sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee and he asks you, "What did you do in the great television ratings wars," you won't have to say, "Well...I shoveled sputum in Manhattan".

Update: I did not have slaps with that editor!


Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!

(And every Wednesday on XM Satellite Radio.)

What They're Saying

"Have not noticed Ed Driscoll's blog until Instapundit pointed it out. Treat yourself."--The American Conservative Party


Navigation
Weblog
Ed TV
Podcasts
Articles
Essays
Interviews
Links
About Me
FAQ
Photos

Home

Support the Site

Search



Archives
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002

Etcetera


Bookmark Me!

Blogroll Me!

Steal This Button!

Syndicate this site (XML)
Podcasts Feed

AddThis Feed Button

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Our Podcasts' Apple iTunes Page

Powered by
Movable Type 3.35

Site design by
Sekimori

Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved