Our Post-Objective Media, Example XXXXVII
"Armed Liberal" writes:
Deborah Howell, the Post ombudswoman, has a piece up on l'affaire Arkin.Indeed it does. And it's right in line with a trend I've been casually tracking since the early days of this blog, which James Taranto summed up thusly last year:
Something odd is afoot in America's elite media--increasingly, journalists are unabashed about admitting their liberal bias.Back in November, James Q. Wilson wrote:
But in the Vietnam era, an important restraint on sectarian partisanship still operated: the mass media catered to a mass audience and hence had an economic interest in appealing to as broad a public as possible. Today, however, we are in the midst of a fierce competition among media outlets, with newspapers trying, not very successfully, to survive against 24/7 TV and radio news coverage and the Internet. As a consequence of this struggle, radio, magazines, and newspapers are engaged in niche marketing, seeking to mobilize not a broad market but a specialized one, either liberal or conservative.As Howell implies in her support of Arkin, clearly, the Post's readers on the left have their ideal journalist; but what does this trend forecast for the future of Big Media?
Update: "So the Washington Post and NBC News has William Arkin but the New York Times unbelievably has John Burns".
Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!
(And every Saturday on Sirius XM Satellite Radio.)
What They're Saying
"Well, art is art, isn't it? Still, on the other hand, water is water. And east is east and west is west, and if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce, they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb does. Now, uh... Now you tell me what you know."--Groucho Marx
Support the Site
Site design by
Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved