Our Post-Objective Media, Example XXXXVII
"Armed Liberal" writes:
Deborah Howell, the Post ombudswoman, has a piece up on l'affaire Arkin.Indeed it does. And it's right in line with a trend I've been casually tracking since the early days of this blog, which James Taranto summed up thusly last year:
Something odd is afoot in America's elite media--increasingly, journalists are unabashed about admitting their liberal bias.Back in November, James Q. Wilson wrote:
But in the Vietnam era, an important restraint on sectarian partisanship still operated: the mass media catered to a mass audience and hence had an economic interest in appealing to as broad a public as possible. Today, however, we are in the midst of a fierce competition among media outlets, with newspapers trying, not very successfully, to survive against 24/7 TV and radio news coverage and the Internet. As a consequence of this struggle, radio, magazines, and newspapers are engaged in niche marketing, seeking to mobilize not a broad market but a specialized one, either liberal or conservative.As Howell implies in her support of Arkin, clearly, the Post's readers on the left have their ideal journalist; but what does this trend forecast for the future of Big Media?
Update: "So the Washington Post and NBC News has William Arkin but the New York Times unbelievably has John Burns".
Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!
(And every Saturday on Sirius XM Satellite Radio.)
What They're Saying
"Just this week, the McCain camp released an ad that looked astonishingly similar to a parody ad created by blogger Ed Driscoll, which combined Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's famous '3 AM' ad with a second segment telling viewers that Mr. McCain also could be relied upon to respond to a crisis situation." --The Washington Times, September 5, 2008
Support the Site
Site design by
Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved