Do Strawmen Wear Ear Buds or Headphones?
By Ed Driscoll · December 30, 2005 08:36 PM · The Electronic Cottage
My wife gave me a 20-gig iRiver MP3 player for Christmas, which I'm happily loading up with all of my favorite tunes, and having a blast playing.
At least, I thought I was, until I read that I actually hate it:
Conservatives don't like personal audio players. Seventeen years ago, Allan Bloom inveighed against the Walkman, arguing that clapping on the headphones was a selfish, narcissistic manoeuver, in which teenagers sealed themselves into a "nonstop ... masturbational fantasy". This year, in "The Age of Egocasting", conservative writer Christine Rosen argued that iPods and MP3 players had accelerated this cultural erosion even further: iPod users had devolved into such navel-gazing twits that they don't even notice where they're going, and miss subway stops. Personal audio players, conservatives worry, are the ultimate statement that the individual is paramount; the world around us can go screw itself, because we're not even paying attention.Of course we hate MP3 players! That's why NRO, James Lileks and TCS Daily have all been experimenting in one form or another with podcasting. Heck, some of us knuckledraggers on the right even know how to make our own music to play on them!
Hate 'em? We hate 'em as much as we hate Weblogs!
Seriously though, blogger Elemenohpee has the best rebuttal to this strawman argument:
Okay, I don't really consider myself conservative, but for the sake of this argument, let's say I am. I also know that a big chunk of my vast and highly intelligent readership is conservative. How many of you hate MP3 players? How many of you own an MP3 player? Does anyone hate hate the idea of personal choice, especially personal choice in music players?Indeed. In the 50th Anniversary issue of National Review, Lawrence Lindsey described Milton and Rose Friedman's seminal Free To Choose thusly:
Their 1980 book Free to Choose successfully instigated a revolution in public policy because it offered conservatives both a rhetorical weapon and a legislative program. Until then, the Left had a clear advantage on both scores. Rhetorically, the Left promised compassion and equality and packaged them with programmatic action in the form of ever more government power. Those opposed to an ever larger and more intrusive state were thus forced to defend hard-heartedness and inequality, and to oppose legislative change.Now, I may not be too crazy about what you play on your MP3 player--and you may not be too crazy about what I play on mine (although you might be surprised by some of my choices). But I don't think there are too many folks on the right getting worked up about people listening to iPods, iRivers or other devices.
(Via Matt Rosenberg.)
Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!
(And every Saturday on Sirius XM Satellite Radio.)
What They're Saying
"If you're looking to wrap your arms around the key points of the Long Tail theory, check out the new 15-minute podcast with Long Tail author Chris Anderson over at TCS Daily. During the conversation with TCS Daily columnist Ed Driscoll, Chris explains what the shift from mass markets to niche markets means for business organizations and gives various examples throughout history when a changing economic distribution system altered the relationship between "blockbusters" and niche products."--Fortune
Support the Site
Site design by
Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved