|
|
|
No Star Wars for Oil
By Ed Driscoll · May 11, 2005 11:14 AM
· Hollywood, Interrupted
Three years ago, when I saw Star Wars: Attack of the Clones, I was surprised that George Lucas inserted an anti-smoking message (remember the "death sticks" bit near the beginning of the film?) into the middle of a movie set "a long time ago in a galaxy...", well, you know the drill. This time around, Craig Winneker, editor of Tech Central Station's European site, says that Revenge of the Sith is "rife" with "a recurring anti-Bush, anti-Iraq war message. Forget about the merits of the argument in question. This stuff has no place in a Star Wars flick": The dialogue in ROTS is rife with distinctly unsubtle references to the current political situation. "This war represents a failure to listen," Padme laments at one point, before declaring after a vote to give executive power to Chancellor Palpatine: "So this is how liberty dies -- to thunderous applause." The wicked Chancellor, played brilliantly by Ian McDiarmid, talks on and on about "security", giving it an evilly sibilant S, and about "peace". As he lures Anakin over to the dark side, telling him what to say in Jedi Council meetings, you wonder if he's supposed to be Karl Rove. He does, after all, appear to be the smartest man in the movie.Winneker speculates that the inclusion of this material came from a rewrite done by Tom Stoppard, whom Winneker describes as, "a vocal opponent of the Iraq war and recently wrote a dramatic trilogy idealizing the roots of socialism". Fortunately, as Winneker says, "The film is exciting enough that I overlooked the few annoying instances when it veered away from its fantasy world and towards today's front pages". Now, Revenge of the Sith will print money for George Lucas, particularly since it's being promoted as the last Star Wars film (I still think Lucas will eventually make the final trilogy, even if he only executive produces them and lets someone else direct. There's just too much money to be made.) But it's funny: the New York Times recently ran an article wondering why Hollywood's box office is down this year. Could it be because of efforts similar this in so many other films over the last 15 year or so, sure to alienate moviegoers in, what after the 2000 election was dubbed the Red States--flyover country where films need to make the bulk of their money in the US to be a hit--have started to take their toil? As the Times noted, Ridley Scott's Kingdom of Heaven had a surprisingly poor domestic box office showing: The historical epic about the Crusades, which stars Orlando Bloom and was directed by Ridley Scott, took in just $20 million at the domestic box office, a puny opening for a film that cost about $130 million to make and was supported by a major marketing push. The film was helped by a stronger performance abroad, where it took in $56 million in 93 territories.Even $20 million sounds impressive until you consider that average ticket prices are around $9 in the US, which means that last weekend, only about 222,220 people saw Kingdom, which are far less viewers than Larry King or the average MSNBC show receives in a single night--and neither of those examples are at the top of the scrap for cable ratings. The R rating doesn't help: as Michael Medved has pointed out on numerous occasions, "Over the past 30 years, 'G' and 'PG' material has consistently drawn larger audiences than releases rated 'R'". In fact, it's telling that the highest grossing R rated movie is The Passion. Or, heck, maybe it was just the poor reviews Kingdom received from the Blogosphere... Update: Speaking of "No Star Wars For Oil", John Podhoretz has some additional thoughts.
|
News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo! (And every Thursday on XM Satellite Radio.) What They're Saying
"A testosterone injection of opinion"--Michelle Malkin Navigation
Support the Site
Search
Archives
May 2008April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 Etcetera
![]() Bookmark Me! Blogroll Me! ![]() |
Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved |