Ed Driscoll.com Ed Driscoll.com
DEATH TOLL LOWERED IN AFGHAN
By Ed Driscoll · March 26, 2002 09:19 PM ·

DEATH TOLL LOWERED IN AFGHAN QUAKE: Yahoo News is reporting that the death toll in Monday's Afghan Quake was dramatically lowered from 1800 to a current estimate of about 200.

The toll could go somewhat higher, he said, but was not expected to exceed "the low hundreds," [Ros O'Sullivan, project coordinator from Concern Worldwide] said Wednesday. That conclusion was reached Tuesday night during a meeting of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the International Organization for Migration, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Concern Worldwide, and other relief groups working at the scene.
Good. But still, it goes without saying that a nation of mud-brick houses faces huge risks when there's an earthquake. Back in early 2001, Jonah Goldberg wrote about the then recent earthquake in India which killed an estimated 20,000:
Modern buildings have a tendency to fall down less than squalid tenements or shantytowns. Especially when you're rich enough to make them quake proof.

So again you ask, why is this relevant?

Well, if you listen to what the anti-globalization protesters are saying at the World Forum in Davos, Switzerland, or at my local coffeehouse, you'd get the impression that they have the best interests of poor people at heart. Of course, it turns out they don' t.

Globalization is generally something rich people are against and poor people are for, which is funny since rich people are supposed to be greedy and poor people are supposed to be content. This is true about both certain conservatives and liberals but for different reasons. Conservative anti-globalists and trade unionists fear what globalization will do to people inside our borders. That creates problems to be sure, but it's not nearly so evil as a certain breed of liberal nostalgia which wants to make the world safe for righteous tours of impoverished lands where noble savages still live in huts and starve with surprising regularity.

Okay so maybe most of them don't live in huts, but they do live in a crushing poverty that so many liberals think is preferable to being forced to eat at McDonalds or drink Starbucks coffee.

Comments

News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!

(And every Wednesday on XM Satellite Radio.)

What They're Saying

"Super-Readworthy"!--Tim Blair


Navigation
Weblog
Ed TV
Podcasts
Articles
Essays
Interviews
Links
About Me
FAQ
Photos

Home

Support the Site

Search



Archives
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002

Etcetera


Bookmark Me!

Blogroll Me!

Steal This Button!

Syndicate this site (XML)
Podcasts Feed

AddThis Feed Button

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Our Podcasts' Apple iTunes Page

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved