Ed Driscoll.com Ed Driscoll.com
PRESIDENT REAGAN'S HANDLING OF THE
By Ed Driscoll · July 14, 2003 10:28 PM ·

PRESIDENT REAGAN'S HANDLING OF THE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS' STRIKE was one of the (many) moments of his administration that was greater than the sum of its events. In her book about Reagan, Peggy Noonan quoted the Gipper's Secretary of State George Schultz, who called it:

"One of the most fortuitous foreign relations moves he ever made". It was in no way a popular move with the American public but it showed European heads of state and diplomatic personnel that he was tough and meant what he said.
Perhaps learning from this event, in a similar, but preemptive move, the Bush Administration is refusing to allow the Transportation Security Administration to unionize:
Airport security screeners don't have the right to unionize, according to the agency handling labor issues for the federal government.

The Federal Labor Relations Authority ruled that the screeners' boss, Transportation Security Administration chief James Loy, has discretion to decide the terms and conditions of their employment.

Loy in January signed an order forbidding collective bargaining by screeners, saying unions are incompatible with the war on terror that screeners are helping the government wage. Union contracts could limit the flexibility needed to make sudden changes in shift assignments in response to terror threats, Loy said.

AP reports that "the screeners earn between $23,600 to $35,400 a year, with health care, life insurance, paid vacation and sick leave. Before Sept. 11, the private-sector screeners earned less and often had no benefits."

An average salary of about 30K for work that could be done by any able-bodied person with little or no specialized training seems pretty darn good to me. What more could the unions bring them, other than increased red tape. And what happens when the inevitable strike occurs, just as it did with the air traffic controllers?

As Calvin Coolidge said when he was governor of Massachusetts, "There is no right to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, at anytime". Too bad the union who wants to represent the TSA doesn't get this.

Comments

News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!

(And every Wednesday on XM Satellite Radio.)

What They're Saying

"As blogger Ed Driscoll noted..."--The Wall Street Journal


Navigation
Weblog
Ed TV
Podcasts
Articles
Essays
Interviews
Links
About Me
FAQ
Photos

Home

Support the Site

Search



Archives
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002

Etcetera


Bookmark Me!

Blogroll Me!

Steal This Button!

Syndicate this site (XML)
Podcasts Feed

AddThis Feed Button

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Our Podcasts' Apple iTunes Page

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2

Site design by
Sekimori

Copyright © 2002-2008 Edward B. Driscoll, Jr. All Rights Reserved